pops77s wrote:BCB, damn it man, you and I know this, but convincing the public that thinks otherwise is the goal. There isnt a magic bait, they dont get special stuff that we cant get, they are just that damn good at their trade. We can and we will continue to do the same thing, we are a creature of habit and hate change. I understand the sponsors would not allow it and shame on them. We as competitors could care less what we have to work with as long as it is fair across the board. My competitive mind set is, I will kick your butt no matter what when or where, if its not, I better stay at home and grill hot dogs. We, as a sport do a horrible job of getting people involved and excited about what we do. B.A.S.S. has done a better job than the FLW, for to me, very obvious reasons. If the FLW doesnt change their ways of doing some things they will always be a second rate. If you read Mike Iaconellis book you can see where he found the idea to bring fishing to the public in a very different way. He talks about when he was in high school and didnt want people to know he was a fisherman because he didnt want them to think he was weird. He later understood he could help change peoples thought process. His classic win put him in a position to do so, and on the drive home Mike started laying out some of his plans. With the help of some of his closest friends he has created a way to bring his knowledge and passion to the average Joe. Way to go Mike, you get it. We now have competitive fishing in the college ranks and are getting our sport imbedded in some high schools across the country I could only wish we had this when I was in school. The opportunity is out there for us to build this sport we call fishing. We just have to get some great minds together and find the avenues then build the vehicle. How many said the NFL/ AFL merge would never work??? How many said it would “ONE”BrianBrian, if it were to happen Id lay out my coin for pay per view if that is what it would take to get it started. I did the same for MLF. I like the essence of the format. However, I dont see enough mula to trump competing organizations for FLW and B.A.S.S anglers to gravitate away from their comfort zone with current sponsors. The money is so sparse thats why you see very few anglers fishing both trails. I think Ish and Brandon Paulinak are a few to do that and Ive read Ish has family coin to support him. I hope MLF continues to grow. Its the closest thing Ive seen. Im more a FLW fan and wished there were more to participate on the MLF. Those guys are second to none or at a minimum equal to the Elites. Brent Ehler proved that on MLF as the only FLW representative in the format and win….. Sponsor are not going carry this through early on IMO on TV. We as fans need to support this too with our pocket books with pay per view. Put up or shut up guys. This is what its going to take. MLF is being marketed in the right direction with pay per view to help offset cost. Pay per view if done right as internet tease has potential. Doing the things to get anglers interested by sharing winning patterns is a great start. Additionally theres more that can happen with fishing and boating tips from sponsors like BassCat, Yamaha, Merc, BRP, Power Pole, Minn Kota HB, Lowrance to help anglers actualize their investments with their boating passions. There is potential there. Offer more into Pay Per View with sponsored pros is the worm on the hook…… However, the info has to be short, easy to understand and beneficial. Now that is challenging but what its going to take. Can you imagine if every bass fisherman ponied up $20 for Pay Per View? I think a few have…. IMO Thats how your going to grow toward a WCBT format and that will not happen overnight. Yea, college fishing, high school are great legacies for future anglers but to appreciate the cream at the top requires $$$$$$$$.